Welcome to Drinks&Co

You must be over 18 to enter this site.

Please enter your year of birth.

Please drink responsibly
Trends:

Sauternes

Château Climens 1925

75cl

Château Climens 2016

£82.88
£82.88

This product is out of stock
You can buy Château Climens 2016

Technical sheet

Type Of Wine: sweet wine
Vintage: 1925 Other vintages
Appellation:Sauternes (Bordeaux, France)
Volume: 75cl
Grapes: Sémillon
Allergens: Contains Sulfites
The Château Climens 1925 is a sweet wine from the appellation Sauternes with the best sémillon grapes from the 1925 vintage. According to Drinks&Co users, this sweet wine earns 4 out of 5 points.

Description of Château Climens 1925

Château Climens 1925 (Sémillon)

Producer:

Appellation: Sauternes

Grapes: Sémillon

See more

Reviews of Château Climens 1925

4

1 customer reviews
  • 5
    0
  • 4
    1
  • 3
    0
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0
Your rating for Château Climens 1925:Rate Château Climens 1925:

4 /5

Château Climens är det vin jag alltid köper.
Attraktiv och intensiv färg. Mycket köttig i munnen.
View more
,

4 /5

Dessverre smakte den eddik.
I Sauternes finnes det ikke bedre.
View more
,

4 /5

Han havde en meget høj farve. Var mangelfuld, fordi det smagte som kork.
Denne Sauternes underholdt os venter på maden.
Jeg nød med en god ven.
View more
,
Reviews of other vintages of Château Climens 1925020120201602015

4/5

A very good Climens, great finesse, very successful wine for this difficult vintage. It has a simple, slightly malic bouquet at first, almost Germanic in style, scents of yellow flowers emerging with time, coalescing and gaining more richness. The palate is medium-bodied with a viscous entry. There appears to be more botrytis here and certainly more weight on the fresh finish that is tinged with barley sugar, betraying.Barsac origins.
View more
Anonymous

4/5

In the mouth it it tastes like licorice.
My final conclusion is positive.
View more
John Mccarthy

4/5

I had it alone. It was a birthday present for my friend.
Typical opacity of a Château Climens. I think it was correct.
View more
Edward Collins